<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Insights on QFT - Quantitative Financial Technology</title><link>https://qft-analytics.com/insights/</link><description>Recent content in Insights on QFT - Quantitative Financial Technology</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>de</language><atom:link href="https://qft-analytics.com/insights/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>AI in Alternative Investments: From Hype to Reality</title><link>https://qft-analytics.com/insights/ai-in-alternatives/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://qft-analytics.com/insights/ai-in-alternatives/</guid><description>&lt;style&gt;
 .insd-footnotes {
 margin-top: 3rem;
 padding-top: 1.5rem;
 border-top: 1px solid #e2e8f0;
 }
 .insd-footnotes h3 {
 font-family: "Inter", sans-serif;
 font-size: 0.85rem;
 font-weight: 600;
 color: #0f172a;
 margin-bottom: 0.75rem;
 letter-spacing: 0.04em;
 text-transform: uppercase;
 }
 .insd-footnotes ol {
 padding-left: 1.25rem;
 margin: 0;
 }
 .insd-footnotes li {
 font-size: 0.82rem;
 color: #64748b;
 line-height: 1.6;
 margin-bottom: 0.5rem;
 }
 .insd-footnotes a {
 color: #3b6bd5;
 text-decoration: none;
 }
 .insd-footnotes a:hover {
 text-decoration: underline;
 }
 .insd-body-inner sup a {
 color: #3b6bd5;
 text-decoration: none;
 font-weight: 600;
 }
 .insd-body-inner sup a:hover {
 text-decoration: underline;
 }
&lt;/style&gt;
&lt;div class="insd"&gt;
 &lt;section class="insd-hero ins-cover--white-paper"&gt;
 &lt;div class="insd-hero-inner"&gt;
 &lt;a class="insd-back" href="../insights/"&gt;Back to Insights&lt;/a&gt;
 &lt;span class="insd-tag insd-tag--white-paper"&gt;
 &lt;span class="ins-type-icon"&gt;
 &lt;svg
 viewBox="0 0 16 16"
 fill="none"
 stroke="currentColor"
 stroke-width="1.4"
 stroke-linecap="round"
 stroke-linejoin="round"
 &gt;
 &lt;path d="M3.5 2h6l3 3v9H3.5z" /&gt;
 &lt;path d="M9 2v3h3.5" /&gt;
 &lt;path d="M5.5 8h5M5.5 10h5M5.5 12h3" /&gt;
 &lt;/svg&gt;
 &lt;/span&gt;
 White Paper
 &lt;/span&gt;
 &lt;h1 class="insd-title"&gt;AI in Alternative Investments: From Hype to Reality&lt;/h1&gt;
 &lt;div class="insd-meta"&gt;
 &lt;span class="insd-author"&gt;
 &lt;span class="insd-author-photo"&gt;
 &lt;img src="../images/team-headshots/rb.jpg" alt="Reiner Braun" loading="lazy" /&gt;
 &lt;/span&gt;
 &lt;span class="insd-author-text"&gt;
 &lt;span class="insd-author-name"&gt;Prof. Dr. Reiner Braun&lt;/span&gt;
 &lt;span class="insd-author-role"&gt;Founder &amp;amp; Strategic Partnerships&lt;/span&gt;
 &lt;/span&gt;
 &lt;/span&gt;
 &lt;span class="insd-date"&gt;April 2026&lt;/span&gt;
 &lt;/div&gt;
 &lt;/div&gt;
 &lt;/section&gt;

 &lt;section class="insd-body"&gt;
 &lt;div class="insd-body-inner"&gt;
 &lt;p class="insd-intro"&gt;
 The discourse surrounding Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the financial industry oscillates between
 doomsday scenarios and hype. Yet beyond the headlines, a clear picture emerges. A second industrial
 revolution is already underway, including in alternative investments.
 &lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>QFT Expands Coverage to 20,000 Proprietary LBO Benchmarks</title><link>https://qft-analytics.com/insights/20000-lbo-benchmarks-coverage/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://qft-analytics.com/insights/20000-lbo-benchmarks-coverage/</guid><description>&lt;div class="insd"&gt;
 &lt;section class="insd-hero ins-cover--company-news"&gt;
 &lt;div class="insd-hero-inner"&gt;
 &lt;a class="insd-back" href="../insights/"&gt;Back to Insights&lt;/a&gt;
 &lt;span class="insd-tag insd-tag--company-news"&gt;
 &lt;span class="ins-type-icon"&gt;
 &lt;svg
 viewBox="0 0 16 16"
 fill="none"
 stroke="currentColor"
 stroke-width="1.5"
 stroke-linecap="round"
 stroke-linejoin="round"
 &gt;
 &lt;path d="M3.5 14V2.5" /&gt;
 &lt;path d="M3.5 2.5h8l-2 3 2 3h-8" /&gt;
 &lt;/svg&gt;
 &lt;/span&gt;
 Company News
 &lt;/span&gt;
 &lt;h1 class="insd-title"&gt;QFT Expands Coverage to 20,000 Proprietary LBO Benchmarks&lt;/h1&gt;
 &lt;div class="insd-meta"&gt;
 &lt;span class="insd-author"&gt;
 &lt;span class="insd-author-photo"&gt;
 &lt;img src="../images/team-headshots/aj.jpg" alt="Alexander J&amp;uuml;rgens" loading="lazy" /&gt;
 &lt;/span&gt;
 &lt;span class="insd-author-text"&gt;
 &lt;span class="insd-author-name"&gt;Dr. Alexander J&amp;uuml;rgens&lt;/span&gt;
 &lt;span class="insd-author-role"&gt;Managing Director&lt;/span&gt;
 &lt;/span&gt;
 &lt;/span&gt;
 &lt;span class="insd-date"&gt;December 2025&lt;/span&gt;
 &lt;/div&gt;
 &lt;/div&gt;
 &lt;/section&gt;

 &lt;section class="insd-body"&gt;
 &lt;div class="insd-body-inner"&gt;
 &lt;p class="insd-intro"&gt;
 QFT's proprietary LBO benchmark dataset has passed 20,000 deal-level observations. The expansion extends
 coverage back to the early 1980s and adds deeper coverage across European mid-market, Nordic, and DACH
 transactions, where published data has historically been thin.
 &lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Separating Skill from Luck: A Quantitative Framework for GP Evaluation</title><link>https://qft-analytics.com/insights/skill-vs-luck-gp-evaluation/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://qft-analytics.com/insights/skill-vs-luck-gp-evaluation/</guid><description>&lt;div class="insd"&gt;
 &lt;section class="insd-hero ins-cover--white-paper"&gt;
 &lt;div class="insd-hero-inner"&gt;
 &lt;a class="insd-back" href="../insights/"&gt;Back to Insights&lt;/a&gt;
 &lt;span class="insd-tag insd-tag--white-paper"&gt;
 &lt;span class="ins-type-icon"&gt;
 &lt;svg
 viewBox="0 0 16 16"
 fill="none"
 stroke="currentColor"
 stroke-width="1.4"
 stroke-linecap="round"
 stroke-linejoin="round"
 &gt;
 &lt;path d="M3.5 2h6l3 3v9H3.5z" /&gt;
 &lt;path d="M9 2v3h3.5" /&gt;
 &lt;path d="M5.5 8h5M5.5 10h5M5.5 12h3" /&gt;
 &lt;/svg&gt;
 &lt;/span&gt;
 White Paper
 &lt;/span&gt;
 &lt;h1 class="insd-title"&gt;Separating Skill from Luck: A Quantitative Framework for GP Evaluation&lt;/h1&gt;
 &lt;div class="insd-meta"&gt;
 &lt;span class="insd-author"&gt;
 &lt;span class="insd-author-photo"&gt;
 &lt;img src="../images/team-headshots/rb.jpg" alt="Reiner Braun" loading="lazy" /&gt;
 &lt;/span&gt;
 &lt;span class="insd-author-text"&gt;
 &lt;span class="insd-author-name"&gt;Prof. Dr. Reiner Braun&lt;/span&gt;
 &lt;span class="insd-author-role"&gt;Founder &amp;amp; Strategic Partnerships&lt;/span&gt;
 &lt;/span&gt;
 &lt;/span&gt;
 &lt;span class="insd-date"&gt;March 2026&lt;/span&gt;
 &lt;/div&gt;
 &lt;/div&gt;
 &lt;/section&gt;

 &lt;section class="insd-body"&gt;
 &lt;div class="insd-body-inner"&gt;
 &lt;p class="insd-intro"&gt;
 Manager rankings in private equity have historically suffered from a statistical problem that is rarely
 acknowledged: fund-level performance is observed with too few data points to reliably separate
 systematic manager skill from the noise of market exposure, sector tailwinds, and deal-specific luck.
 This paper introduces the calibration framework QFT uses to decompose observed returns into attributable
 and non-attributable components.
 &lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The (No-Longer) Hidden Risk in Illiquid Assets: Time</title><link>https://qft-analytics.com/insights/time-risk/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://qft-analytics.com/insights/time-risk/</guid><description>&lt;div class="insd"&gt;
 &lt;section class="insd-hero ins-cover--white-paper"&gt;
 &lt;div class="insd-hero-inner"&gt;
 &lt;a class="insd-back" href="../insights/"&gt;Back to Insights&lt;/a&gt;
 &lt;span class="insd-tag insd-tag--white-paper"&gt;
 &lt;span class="ins-type-icon"&gt;
 &lt;svg
 viewBox="0 0 16 16"
 fill="none"
 stroke="currentColor"
 stroke-width="1.4"
 stroke-linecap="round"
 stroke-linejoin="round"
 &gt;
 &lt;path d="M3.5 2h6l3 3v9H3.5z" /&gt;
 &lt;path d="M9 2v3h3.5" /&gt;
 &lt;path d="M5.5 8h5M5.5 10h5M5.5 12h3" /&gt;
 &lt;/svg&gt;
 &lt;/span&gt;
 White Paper
 &lt;/span&gt;
 &lt;h1 class="insd-title"&gt;The (No-Longer) Hidden Risk in Illiquid Assets: Time&lt;/h1&gt;
 &lt;div class="insd-meta"&gt;
 &lt;span class="insd-author"&gt;
 &lt;span class="insd-author-photo"&gt;
 &lt;img src="../images/team-headshots/rb.jpg" alt="Reiner Braun" loading="lazy" /&gt;
 &lt;/span&gt;
 &lt;span class="insd-author-text"&gt;
 &lt;span class="insd-author-name"&gt;Prof. Dr. Reiner Braun&lt;/span&gt;
 &lt;span class="insd-author-role"&gt;Founder &amp;amp; Strategic Partnerships&lt;/span&gt;
 &lt;/span&gt;
 &lt;/span&gt;
 &lt;span class="insd-date"&gt;March 2026&lt;/span&gt;
 &lt;/div&gt;
 &lt;/div&gt;
 &lt;/section&gt;

 &lt;section class="insd-body"&gt;
 &lt;div class="insd-body-inner"&gt;
 &lt;p class="insd-intro"&gt;
 The rise of alternative investments has exposed a fundamental gap in how we think about risk.
 Traditional portfolio theory treats illiquidity as a constraint, something to optimize around. This
 perspective is incomplete. In illiquid markets, time
 &lt;em&gt;is&lt;/em&gt;
 the risk.
 &lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Persistence Problem: Does GP Track Record Actually Predict Future Performance?</title><link>https://qft-analytics.com/insights/persistence-problem-gp-track-record/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://qft-analytics.com/insights/persistence-problem-gp-track-record/</guid><description>&lt;div class="insd"&gt;
 &lt;section class="insd-hero ins-cover--blog-post"&gt;
 &lt;div class="insd-hero-inner"&gt;
 &lt;a class="insd-back" href="../insights/"&gt;Back to Insights&lt;/a&gt;
 &lt;span class="insd-tag insd-tag--blog-post"&gt;
 &lt;span class="ins-type-icon"&gt;
 &lt;svg
 viewBox="0 0 16 16"
 fill="none"
 stroke="currentColor"
 stroke-width="1.4"
 stroke-linecap="round"
 stroke-linejoin="round"
 &gt;
 &lt;path
 d="M2.5 3.5h11a1 1 0 0 1 1 1v6a1 1 0 0 1-1 1H7l-3 2.5v-2.5H2.5a1 1 0 0 1-1-1v-6a1 1 0 0 1 1-1z"
 /&gt;
 &lt;/svg&gt;
 &lt;/span&gt;
 Blog Post
 &lt;/span&gt;
 &lt;h1 class="insd-title"&gt;
 The Persistence Problem: Does GP Track Record Actually Predict Future Performance?
 &lt;/h1&gt;
 &lt;div class="insd-meta"&gt;
 &lt;span class="insd-author"&gt;
 &lt;span class="insd-author-photo"&gt;
 &lt;img src="../images/team-headshots/mk.jpg" alt="Max Knicker" loading="lazy" /&gt;
 &lt;/span&gt;
 &lt;span class="insd-author-text"&gt;
 &lt;span class="insd-author-name"&gt;Dr. Max Knicker&lt;/span&gt;
 &lt;span class="insd-author-role"&gt;Head of Product&lt;/span&gt;
 &lt;/span&gt;
 &lt;/span&gt;
 &lt;span class="insd-date"&gt;November 2025&lt;/span&gt;
 &lt;/div&gt;
 &lt;/div&gt;
 &lt;/section&gt;

 &lt;section class="insd-body"&gt;
 &lt;div class="insd-body-inner"&gt;
 &lt;p class="insd-intro"&gt;
 The intuitive case for backing experienced GPs is strong: if a manager delivered top-quartile returns
 last time, surely that is informative about what they might deliver next. The academic evidence on this
 question is more nuanced than the intuition suggests, and the nuance matters for how LPs should approach
 manager selection.
 &lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>What Investors Get Wrong About Alpha</title><link>https://qft-analytics.com/insights/beyond-alpha/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://qft-analytics.com/insights/beyond-alpha/</guid><description>&lt;style&gt;
 .insd-footnotes {
 margin-top: 3rem;
 padding-top: 1.5rem;
 border-top: 1px solid #e2e8f0;
 }
 .insd-footnotes h3 {
 font-family: "Inter", sans-serif;
 font-size: 0.85rem;
 font-weight: 600;
 color: #0f172a;
 margin-bottom: 0.75rem;
 letter-spacing: 0.04em;
 text-transform: uppercase;
 }
 .insd-footnotes ol {
 padding-left: 1.25rem;
 margin: 0;
 }
 .insd-footnotes li {
 font-size: 0.82rem;
 color: #64748b;
 line-height: 1.6;
 margin-bottom: 0.5rem;
 }
 .insd-footnotes a {
 color: #3b6bd5;
 text-decoration: none;
 }
 .insd-footnotes a:hover {
 text-decoration: underline;
 }
 .insd-body-inner sup a {
 color: #3b6bd5;
 text-decoration: none;
 font-weight: 600;
 }
 .insd-body-inner sup a:hover {
 text-decoration: underline;
 }
&lt;/style&gt;
&lt;div class="insd"&gt;
 &lt;section class="insd-hero ins-cover--white-paper"&gt;
 &lt;div class="insd-hero-inner"&gt;
 &lt;a class="insd-back" href="../insights/"&gt;Back to Insights&lt;/a&gt;
 &lt;span class="insd-tag insd-tag--white-paper"&gt;
 &lt;span class="ins-type-icon"&gt;
 &lt;svg
 viewBox="0 0 16 16"
 fill="none"
 stroke="currentColor"
 stroke-width="1.4"
 stroke-linecap="round"
 stroke-linejoin="round"
 &gt;
 &lt;path d="M3.5 2h6l3 3v9H3.5z" /&gt;
 &lt;path d="M9 2v3h3.5" /&gt;
 &lt;path d="M5.5 8h5M5.5 10h5M5.5 12h3" /&gt;
 &lt;/svg&gt;
 &lt;/span&gt;
 White Paper
 &lt;/span&gt;
 &lt;h1 class="insd-title"&gt;What Investors Get Wrong About Alpha&lt;/h1&gt;
 &lt;div class="insd-meta"&gt;
 &lt;span class="insd-author"&gt;
 &lt;span class="insd-author-photo"&gt;
 &lt;img src="../images/team-headshots/rb.jpg" alt="Reiner Braun" loading="lazy" /&gt;
 &lt;/span&gt;
 &lt;span class="insd-author-text"&gt;
 &lt;span class="insd-author-name"&gt;Prof. Dr. Reiner Braun&lt;/span&gt;
 &lt;span class="insd-author-role"&gt;Founder &amp;amp; Strategic Partnerships&lt;/span&gt;
 &lt;/span&gt;
 &lt;/span&gt;
 &lt;span class="insd-date"&gt;March 2026&lt;/span&gt;
 &lt;/div&gt;
 &lt;/div&gt;
 &lt;/section&gt;

 &lt;section class="insd-body"&gt;
 &lt;div class="insd-body-inner"&gt;
 &lt;p class="insd-intro"&gt;
 Conversations about investment returns tend to collapse everything into a single question: did the
 manager outperform? The answer is treated as evidence of skill, and skill is treated as the reason to
 invest. This is too simple.
 &lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Why 90% of GPs Remain Unassessed and What That Costs Allocators</title><link>https://qft-analytics.com/insights/90-percent-gps-unassessed/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://qft-analytics.com/insights/90-percent-gps-unassessed/</guid><description>&lt;div class="insd"&gt;
 &lt;section class="insd-hero ins-cover--industry-insight"&gt;
 &lt;div class="insd-hero-inner"&gt;
 &lt;a class="insd-back" href="../insights/"&gt;Back to Insights&lt;/a&gt;
 &lt;span class="insd-tag insd-tag--industry-insight"&gt;
 &lt;span class="ins-type-icon"&gt;
 &lt;svg
 viewBox="0 0 16 16"
 fill="none"
 stroke="currentColor"
 stroke-width="1.6"
 stroke-linecap="round"
 stroke-linejoin="round"
 &gt;
 &lt;path d="M2 13l4-4 3 3 5-6" /&gt;
 &lt;path d="M9.5 6h4v4" /&gt;
 &lt;/svg&gt;
 &lt;/span&gt;
 Industry Insight
 &lt;/span&gt;
 &lt;h1 class="insd-title"&gt;Why 90% of GPs Remain Unassessed and What That Costs Allocators&lt;/h1&gt;
 &lt;div class="insd-meta"&gt;
 &lt;span class="insd-author"&gt;
 &lt;span class="insd-author-photo"&gt;
 &lt;img src="../images/team-headshots/aj.jpg" alt="Alexander J&amp;uuml;rgens" loading="lazy" /&gt;
 &lt;/span&gt;
 &lt;span class="insd-author-text"&gt;
 &lt;span class="insd-author-name"&gt;Dr. Alexander J&amp;uuml;rgens&lt;/span&gt;
 &lt;span class="insd-author-role"&gt;Managing Director&lt;/span&gt;
 &lt;/span&gt;
 &lt;/span&gt;
 &lt;span class="insd-date"&gt;February 2026&lt;/span&gt;
 &lt;/div&gt;
 &lt;/div&gt;
 &lt;/section&gt;

 &lt;section class="insd-body"&gt;
 &lt;div class="insd-body-inner"&gt;
 &lt;p class="insd-intro"&gt;
 Public equities have decades of independent, repeatable coverage. Private markets do not. The estimated
 ten percent of GPs that receive formal third-party research captures the largest brand names, but leaves
 the rest of the market systematically underdiagnosed at the point of commitment.
 &lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>